Most mission statements read like they were written by a committee during a fire drill. Lots of "leading", "innovative" and "world-class", and not a single thing anyone could disagree with. That is exactly the problem.
Mission and vision do different jobs
Mixing them up is where it starts. A mission says what you do and why, today. It points inward, to the people who have to act on it. A vision says what the world looks like when you succeed, and what you value on the way there. It points outward, to the people you want to join you.
One should move people to action. The other should make them dream. Neither works if it could sit on any company's wall.
What I look for before I touch a sentence
- A winning idea. What do you do differently that makes someone choose you? If you cannot say it plainly, no amount of polish will help.
- Something concrete. One real measure, "fresh to the customer in under 24 hours", beats a big, idealistic line that is rooted in nothing.
- No fluff. Use words that mean something to the people who work there. If a word could belong to any company, remove it.
- Short enough to repeat. If your own team cannot say it back, it is not a mission yet. It is a paragraph.
Then test it
This is the part nearly everyone skips. Put the statement on the website, the stationery and the pitch, and watch what happens. A good one makes people ask an intelligent question. A weak one makes them nod and move on.
Involve the people who live it, too. A mission written in a room of three and handed down becomes wall art. One shaped by the people who deliver it gets defended in meetings you are not in.
And revisit it
Brands change, and a statement that never changes is usually one that nobody reads. About once a year, ask whether it still shows what the company is for. You rarely need to start again. You need to listen again.
That is where the Goodseph method begins: listen to what your people want from you, then say it in words short enough to repeat.
Leave a Reply